DRAWING CODES: Experimental Protocols of Architectural Representation
Curated by Andrew Kudless & Adam Marcus
VOLUME I
January 17 – February 4, 2017 at the Hubbell Street Galleries, California College of the Arts, San Francisco
July 8 – August 20, 2017 at the WUHO Gallery, Los Angeles
January 10 – February 9, 2018 at the Banvard Gallery, Knowlton School of Architecture, Ohio State University, Columbus
March 6 – March 28, 2018 at the University of Michigan Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning
VOLUME II
January 22 – February 23, 2019 at the Arthur A. Houghton, Jr. Gallery, The Cooper Union / Irwin S. Chanin School of Architecture, New York
March 18 – April 22, 2019 at the Elmaleh Gallery, University of Virginia School of Architecture, Charlottesville
August 9 – October 19, 2019 at the Korach Gallery, University of Miami School of Architecture, Miami
February 3 – March 13, 2020 at the Gould Gallery, University of Washington College of Built Environments, Seattle
September 1 – October 8, 2021 at the Hubbell Street Galleries, California College of the Arts, San Francisco
Drawing Codes, Vol. I at CCA Hubbell Street Galleries, San Francisco
January 17 – February 4, 2017
Drawing Codes, Vol. I at WUHO Gallery, Los Angeles
July 8 – August 20, 2017
Photographs of LA opening by Mikey Tnasuttimonkol
Drawing Codes, Vol. I at Banvard Gallery, Knowlton School of Architecture, Ohio State University, Columbus
January 10 – February 9, 2018
Drawing Codes, Vol. I at University of Michigan Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Ann Arbor
March 6 – March 28, 2018
Drawing Codes, Vol. II at the University of Virginia School of Architecture, Charlottesville
March 18 – April 18, 2019
Photographs by Tom Daly and UVA School of Architecture
Drawing Codes, Vol. II at the Arthur A. Houghton, Jr. Gallery at The Cooper Union, New York
January 22 – February 23, 2019
Photographs by Lia Bertucci / The Cooper Union, Irwin S. Chanin School of Architecture
Drawing Codes, Vol. II at the Korach Gallery, University of Miami School of Architecture
August 9 – October 19, 2019
Drawing Codes, Vol. II at the Gould Gallery, University of Washington College of Built Environments, Seattle
February 3 – March 13, 2020
Photographs by Vlanka Catalan
Drawing Codes, Vol. II at CCA Hubbell Street Galleries, San Francisco
September 1 – October 8, 2021
Photographs by Nicholas Bruno
Emerging technologies of design and production have opened up new ways to engage with traditional practices of architectural drawing. The 48 drawings commissioned for the two volumes of this exhibition explore the impact of such technologies on the relationship between code and drawing: how rules and constraints inform the ways architects document, analyze, represent, and design the built environment.
Each drawing engages with at least one of the below prompts that begin to expand the notion of code as it relates to architectural design and representation:
Code as generative constraint. Restrictive codes often govern what is permitted and what is prohibited. Examples of this include building codes, urban codes, zoning codes, accessibility codes, and energy codes. How can such constraints become generative, opening up opportunities for design and representation?
Code as language. A code can be understood as a set of rules, conventions, and traditions of syntax and grammar that structure the communication of information. The discipline of architecture similarly has its own language of typologies, taxonomies, and classifications. How can drawing engage with such architectural languages?
Code as cipher. Encoded or encrypted messages are intended to hide or conceal information. Likewise, architectural geometries, forms, spaces, and assemblies are embedded with invisible organizational, social, political, or economic logics that may not be immediately evident. How can drawing engage with these latent meanings and messages?
Code as script. A code can be understood as a script or a recipe: a set of instructions to be executed or performed by a computer, a robot, or (in the case of theater or film), an actor. Scripts often produce unexpected discrepancies between the intent of the code and how it is executed. How can drawing explore these open-ended processes that may not have a defined outcome?
The invited architects were asked to conform to a set of strict rules: consistent dimension, black & white medium, and limiting the drawing to orthographic projection. The intent is for this consistency to emphasize the wide range of approaches to questions of technology, design, and representation. Yet within this considerable diversity of medium, aesthetic sensibility, and content, several common qualities emerge. First is the unsure link between code and outcome: glitches, bugs, accidents, anomalies, but also loopholes, deviations, variances, and departures that open up new potentials for architectural design and representation. Second is a mature embrace of technology not as a fetishized end game, but as an instrument employed synthetically in concert with other architectural “tools of the trade.” And finally, these drawings demonstrate how conventions of architectural representation remain fertile territory for invention and speculation.
At the show's initial run at CCA in San Francisco, an adjacent gallery featured work by CCA Architecture students in Kinematic Code, a course taught by Clayton Muhleman that has been exploring procedural and robotic drawing techniques.
Project Credits:
Curators: Adam Marcus & Andrew Kudless
Exhibition Assistants: Gina Bugiada, Lina Kudinar, Marc Northstar
Acknowledgements: Jaime Austin, Stephen Beal, Jason Kelly Johnson, Jonathan Massey, Karina O’Neill, Amanda Schwerin, Dustin Smith, Justin Smith, Lisa Findley, Keith Krumwiede, Laura Ng, Ingalill Wahlroos-Ritter, Sandhya Kochar, Mary Ann Wilkinson, Sharon Haar, Nader Tehrani, Steven Hillyer, Ila Berman, Sneha Patel, Melissa Goldman, Rodolphe el-Khoury, Shawna Meyer, The Miller Hull Partnership, Renee Cheng, Joshua Polansky, Robert Hutchinson, Vlanka Catalan, Sarah Chan, Bryndis Hafthorsdottir, Manuel Angeja
by Mark Ericson
Project Statement
Tractate four of Guarino Guarini’s treatise, Architettura civile (1735), deals entirely with orthographic projection. In “Observation Nine” of chapter three in the fourth tractate, Guarini describes the process of obtaining the drawings for a vault that intersects a cylinder at an oblique angle. He begins by describing the oblique section of a cylinder as an ellipse, referencing Euclid. He goes on to explain that since we can measure the height and breadth of the ellipse in the orthographic drawings, we have the information to construct the ellipse that is the section through the cylinder at the plane of intersection with vault. He also provides a template for the ellipse and instructs the reader to make a drawing instrument out of “strong card” using the template as a guide. Guarini utilized an argument from Euclid to create an instrument that draws curves specific to the angle of incidence between a cylinder and an orthographic projection.
The drawing included in this exhibition, is part of series that translates the written and drawn instructions from the fourth tractate of Architettura civile, into a set of repeatable procedures that vary over time. This particular drawing uses the techniques of “Observation Nine” to orthographically project a semicircle onto cones moving about the minor and major orbits of an epicycle of ellipses. The cones vary in height, orientation, and radius over time, producing differing conic sections. Whereas Guarini produced a single static template, this drawing utilizes the same techniques to produce a set variable conic sections. Importantly, like Guarini’s work this drawing is confined to the use of points and lines on a two-dimensional plane. All of the apparent circles and curves are composed of points and line segments. There are no three-dimensional objects, surfaces, or curves of any kind. The drawing is an orthographic projection.
Bio
Mark Ericson holds a Master’s of Architecture from SCI_Arc and Bachelor of Arts from Rutgers College. His drawings have been published in LOG, 306090, and the catalog for the Museum of Modern Art exhibition Uneven Growth. His research and teaching focus on the relationship between historical practices of drawing and contemporary developments in the discipline. He is currently an Associate Professor in the School of Architecture at Woodbury University in Los Angeles.